This page contains notable observations of different Courts of India and abroad which is a settled law now.
Velugubanti Hari Babu vs. Parvathini Narasimha Rao and Ors. [2018 (3) ALD 456]: Telangana & Andhra Pradesh High Court An interim order under section 9 of the Arbitration Act continues till conclusion of the arbitral proceedings and does not stop to operate with constitution of arbitral tribunal 29. As regards the submission that the interim […]
Lite Bite Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. Airports Authority of India [MANU/MH/3423/2019]: Bombay High Court A brief on the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator by a person who is party to the dispute. 26. In summary, the legal principles are these: (a) An officer or employee of one party cannot be the arbitrator or, upon
Unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator by a person who is party to the dispute Read More »
Bharat Aluminium Co. vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Ltd. [(2012) 9 SCC 552] Court at the seat of arbitration will have the supervisory jurisdiction despite it not having jurisdiction over the subject-matter of arbitration 96. We are of the opinion, the term “subject matter of the arbitration” cannot be confused with “subject matter of the
Seat can be chosen irrespective of the presence subject-matter of arbitration Read More »
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Litigating Hand website (our website), the user acknowledges that:
