NRI quota is neither sacrosanct, not inviolable in terms of existence in any given year, or its extent Nilay Gupta vs Chairman NEET PG Medical and Dental Admission/Counselling Board 2020 and Principal Govt. Dental College & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3345/2020] [09.10.2020] – NRI seats – not mandatory Brief: In the present case, the Appellants […]
Supreme Court relaxes the bail condition imposed by the High Court and allows the accused to visit college Ankita Kailash Khandelwal & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Criminal Appeal Nos. 660-662 of 2020] [08.10.2020] – Bail condition – excessive – Article 21 Brief: The appellants in the present appeal were accused of ragging
An accused is not entitled to copy of statement U/s 164 unless cognizance is taken and process is issued Miss ‘A’ vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [Criminal Appeal No.659 of 2020] [08.10.2020] – Supply of documents (164 statement) to the accused – Appropriate stage Brief: In the present case the High Court had
No person or group of persons can block public places to express dissent more so for indefinite time Amit Sahni vs. Commissioner of Police & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3282 of 2020] [08.10.2020] – Saheen Bagh Protest – Anti- Citizenship Act Protests Brief: In this appeal, the Appellant had grievance from the blocking of roads
Mere inclusion of candidate in a selection list does not confer a vested right to appointment Commissioner of Police and Anr vs. Umesh Kumar [Civil Appeal No. 3334 of 2020] [07.10.2020] – Place in selection list for service – revised result – exclusion – no vested right Brief: The respondents in the present appeal obtained
Juvenility for an offence committed under the JJ Act, 1986 is as defined in JJ Act 2000 i.e. 18 years as on date of offence Satya Deo @ Bhoorey vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 860 of 2019] [07.10.2020] – Life sentence – Determination of Juvenility Brief: In this case, the Appellant/accused had
SLP is not maintainable against order of dismissal of review petition unless the main judgement of the High Court is challengeable and is challenged T.K. David vs. Kuruppampady Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Ors. [Special Leave Petition (C) No.10482 of 2020] [05.10.2020] – SLP – Review Petition – Main judgement Brief: In this petition, the
Notice is no impediment to recovery of vehicle unless the Hire-Purchase Agreement mandates it or it is otherwise implicit in the Agreement and loss is shown by the hirer M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. vs. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari [Civil Appeal No. 5622 of 2019] [01.10.2020] – Hire-Purchase Agreement – Default in installments – Notice –Re-possession –
Supreme Court confirms award of damages and quantum of damages awarded by an arbitrator M/S Arun Kumar Kamal Kumar & Ors. vs. M/S Selected Marble Home & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 8980 of 2017] [01.10.2020] Damages and quantum off damages Brief: This appeal concerned with grant of damages and quantum of the damages. The Supreme
Supreme Court confirms award of damages and quantum of damages awarded by an arbitrator Read More »
Supreme Court charters directions for refund of amounts against cancellation of airline tickets Pravasi Legal Cell & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P. (C) D. No.10966 of 2020] [01.09.2020] Refunds of amounts on cancellation of airline tickets due to COVID Brief: In a club of petitions, the Supreme Court has issued several modified
