News of the Day

Through GOI v. Vedanta Ltd. (Formerly Cairn India Ltd.) & Ors [2020 SCC OnLine SC 381] 16.09.2020: Arbitration Act – Foreign Award – Enforcement – Limitation – Public Policy Brief: In this case the Supreme Court has held allowed enforcement of an arbitral award passed in Malaysia. While enforcing, the Court firstly, held that the limitation […]

Limitation period for enforcement of foreign arbitral award is three years Read More Β»

Jugut Ram vs. The State of Chhattisgarh [Criminal Appeal No.  616 of 2020] IPC – Section 302 vs. Section 304 Brief: In the case, the Supreme Court has changed the conviction of appellant from under section 302 to under section 304 Part II as the assault was not pre-mediated but had taken place in a heat of passion. Moreover, lathi was used to assault

Lathi is not a weapon of assault simpliciter Read More Β»

Balasore Alloys Limited vs. Medima LLC [Arbitration Petition (Civil) No. 15/2020] [16.09.2020] – Arbitration – Appointment of Arbitrator – Conflicting arbitration clauses Brief: In this Petition, their existed two arbitration clauses in separate documents of a single main contract. The Supreme Court noted that in order to harmonise or reconcile and arrive at a conclusion as to which of

Nature of dispute will determine which dispute resolution clause will apply when two conflicting clauses exist in same agreement Read More Β»

Pravin Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 6270 of 2012] [10.09.2020] – Judicial Review – difference between disciplinary proceedings and criminal proceedings Brief: In this the Supreme Court upheld the dismissal order of Appellant for charges of corruption and extra-constitutional conduct. The Court held that the threshold of judicial review under

Non-continuation of criminal proceedings does not bar disciplinary action Read More Β»

Rizwan Khan vs. The State of Chhattisgarh [Criminal Appeal No. 580 of 2020] [10.09.2020] – Independent witness – Complainant and Investigating authority as same person – Recovery of vehicle – Clerical errors Brief: In this criminal appeal the Supreme Court confirmed the conviction of the accused under section 20(b)(ii)(B), NDPS Act, 1985. The Court held

Independent witness is not indispensable to the Prosecution case Read More Β»