M/s Oswal Plastic Industries vs. Manager, Legal Deptt
N.A.I.C.O. Ltd. [Civil Appeal No. 83 of 2023]
Insurance coverage provisions if ambiguous, the same should be resolved in favour of the insured
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
3.4 It is submitted that as observed and held by this Court in the case of Canara Bank vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and Ors.; 2020 (3) SCC 455, provisions of the policy must be read and interpreted in such a manner so as to give effect to the reasonable expectations of all the parties. It is submitted that it is further held that coverage provisions should be interpreted broadly and if there is any ambiguity, the same should be resolved in favour of the insured.
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Litigating Hand website (our website), the user acknowledges that:
The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her information and use. He/She also acknowledges that there has been no attempt by us to advertise or solicit work.
Any information obtained or downloaded by the user from our website does not lead to the creation of the client – attorney relationship between the Firm and the user.
None of the information contained in our website amounts to any form of legal opinion or legal advice.
Our website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using our site, you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, please see our Cookies Policy & Privacy Policy
All information contained in our website is the intellectual property of the Firm.