A. Shyamal Bihari Mishra and Ors. vs Girish Narain Missir and Anr. AIR 1962 Pat 116
It is a cardinal principle of the law of procedure that the decree should agree with the judgment. Where, therefore, its decree is at variance with its judgment, and, when the decree does not correctly express what was really decided and intended by the Court, it has an inherent power to vary or amend its own decree or order so as to carry out its own meaning and intention. Law provides for no limitation for an application to amend the decree under section 152 of the CPC
16. As the decision of the sole question raised in the appeal rests on
the interpretation of Section 152 of the Code, it would be useful at this very
stage, to read it. Section 152 of the Code is to the following effect:
”152. Clerical or arithmetical mistakes
in judgments, decrees or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental
slip or omission may at any time be corrected by the Court either of its own
motion or on the application of any of the parties.”
17. It is a cardinal principle of the law of procedure that the decree
should agree with the judgment. Where, therefore, its decree is at variance
with its judgment, and, when the decree does not correctly express what was
really decided and intended by the Court, it has an inherent power to vary or
amend its own decree or order so as to carry out its own meaning and intention.
In doing so, it does nothing but exercise a power to correct a mistake of its
ministerial officer by whom the decree or order was drawn up. It only insists
that the decree drawn up in the office of the Court should correctly express
the judgment given by the Court. In the words of Lindley, L. J. in re Swire;
Mellor v. Swire (1885) 3 Ch. D. 239 at page 246:
“there is
no such magic in passing and entering an order as to deprive the court of
jurisdiction to make its own records true, and if an order as passed and
entered does not express the real order of the Court, it would, as it appears
to me be shocking to say that the party aggrieved cannot come here to have the
record set right but must go to the House of Lords by way of appeal.”
18. Every Court, therefore, has
an inherent power over
its own records,
so long as those records are
within its powers,
and it can set right any mistake in them.
19. In Hatton v. Haris, (1892) AC 547, at page 560, Lord Watson said:
“When an
error of that kind has been committed, it is always within the competency of
the Court, if nothing has intervened, which would render it inexpedient or
inequitable to do so, to correct the record in order to bring it into harmony
with the order which the Judge obviously meant to pronounce.”
20. Where, however, the decree or order as drawn up represents the real
decision of the Court, it has no jurisdiction to re-hear or alter it.
21. There are, however, only two cases in which the Court can amend or
vary a decree or order after it is drawn up and signed, namely, (1) under its inherent power when the
decree or order does not correctly state what the Court actuality decided and
intended; and, (2) Under Section 152, where there has been a clerical or
arithmetical mistake, or an error arising from an accidental slip or
omission.
22. Under Sections 151 and 152 of the Code very wide powers have been
given to the Court. Section 151 lays down that nothing in this Code shall be
deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make
such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse
of the process of the Court. Under the present Code, an application to amend a
decree so as to bring it in conformity with the judgment must now be made to
the Court in the exercise of its inherent powers under Section 151 of the Code,
Under Order 20, Rule 7 of the Code, it is the duty of the Judge to satisfy
himself that the decree is in conformity with the judgment. This duty primarily
rests with the Court, and, not with any interested party, and therefore, the
Court can do so even suo motu, or, on an application by any interested party,
and, such an application to amend a decree to make it in conformity with the
judgment may be made and entertained by the Court at any time
23. Section 152 however, permits clerical, or arithmetical mistakes in
judgments decrees or orders to be corrected at any time. Section 152,
therefore, deals with one of the two cases, stated above, in which only the
Court can amend or vary a decree or order after it is drawn up and signed.
Under this section, where there has been a clerical or arithemetical mistake,
or an error arising from an accidental slip or omission in a judgment, decree
or order, it may, at any time, be corrected by the Court either on its own
motion or on the application of any of the parties. The amendment petition
under Section 152 of the Code is not a continuation of the suit or proceedings
therein. It is in the nature of an independent proceeding, though connected
with the order of which the amendment is sought. The jurisdiction of the Court
to amend its decree or order on the ground that by inadvertence, because of any
clerical mistake, the decree or order as drawn up does not give effect to the intention
of the Court as expressed in its judgment is undoubted. In order that the
manifest rights of a party, which were intended to be effected by its decision
may not be defeated, the Court always exercises its right to amend its decree
or order, if as drawn up, it is not in conformity with its judgment clue to a
clerical or arithmetical mistake in it.
24. It is therefore, manifest from Section 153 of the Code, that the
Slip Rule, as sometimes it is called, will enable the Court to rectify the slip
and amend its decree or order, which has been drawn up, only (a) where there
has been an accidental slip or omission in the decree or order as drawn up, or,
(b) when the order as drawn up does not correctly state what the Court actually
decided and intended.
25. It is a general principle that rules of limitation are applicable
to acts to be performed by litigants and not to acts which the Court may or has
to perform suo motu. An amendment under Section 152 falls within the latter
class of acts and there is, consequently, no limitation for an application for
amendment under this section. The amendment can be made at any time. The phrase
“at any time”, used in Section 152, indicates that the power of the
Court to amend its decree under this section is uncontrolled by any time
factor, but only by the scope of the section within which it functions. There
is, therefore, no limitation for an application to amend the decree. The decree
may be amended under this section at any time, although the time for appealing
from the decree has expired.