West Bengal State Electricity Board vs. Dilip Kumar Ray [AIR 2007 SC 976]: Supreme Court of India
Malice is not merely the doing a wrongful act intentionally but it must be established that the defendant was actuated by mains animus i.e. improper motive
14. Malicious Prosecution – Malice. Malice means an
improper or indirect motive other than a desire to vindicate public justice or
a private right. It need not necessarily be a feeling of enmity, spite or
ill-will. It may be due to a desire to obtain a collateral advantage. The
principles to be borne in mind in the case of actions for malicious
prosecutions are these:- Malice is not merely the doing a wrongful act
intentionally but it must be established that the defendant was actuated by
mains animus, that is to say, by spite of ill- will or any indirect or improper
motive. But if the defendant had reasonable or probable cause of launching the
criminal prosecution no amount of malice will make him liable for damages.
Reasonable and probable cause must be such as would operate on the mind of a
discreet and reasonable man; ‘malice’ and ‘want of reasonable and probable
cause’ have reference to the state of the defendant’s mind at the date of the
initiation of criminal proceedings and the onus rests on the plaintiff to prove
them.