M.P. State Coop. Bank Ltd., Bhopal vs. Nanuram Yadav and Others [(2007) 8 SCC 264]: Supreme Court of India
Principles to be noted in matter of public appointments
24. It is clear that in the matter of
public appointments, the following principles are to be followed:
(1) The appointments made without
following the appropriate procedure under the rules/government circulars and
without advertisement or inviting applications from the open market would
amount to breach of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
(2) Regularisation cannot be a mode of
appointment.
(3) An appointment made in violation of
the mandatory provisions of the statute and in particular, ignoring the minimum
educational qualification and other essential qualification would be wholly
illegal. Such illegality cannot be cured by taking recourse to regularisation.
(4) Those who come by back door should go
through that door.
(5) No regularisation is permissible in
exercise of the statutory power conferred under Article 162 of the Constitution
of India if the appointments have been made in contravention of the statutory
rules.
(6) The Court should not exercise its jurisdiction
on misplaced sympathy.
(7) If the mischief played is so
widespread and all pervasive affecting the result, so as to make it difficult
to pick out the persons who have been unlawfully benefited or wrongfully
deprived of their selection, it will neither be possible nor necessary to issue
individual show cause notice to each selectee. The only way out would be to
cancel the whole selection.
(8) When the entire selection is
stinking, conceived in fraud and delivered in deceit, individual innocence has
no place and the entire selection has to be set aside.