Ramesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 8819 of 2022]
Under what circumstances can the Court interfere in cases of administrative law-making – Wednesbury principle
42. In the case of Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited v. Wednesbury Corporation ([1948] 1 KB 22), the Kingβs Bench Division was tasked with the question of under what circumstances can the Court interfere in cases of administrative law making. While dealing with this, the Court held that interference in administrative decisions was permissible, only if (i) the order was contrary to law (ii) or relevant factors were not considered, or (iii) irrelevant factors were considered or, (iv) or the decision was such that no other authority under similar circumstances would have come to this conclusion. The relevant paragraph of the judgment are reproduced herein:
βIn the result, this appeal must be dismissed. I do not wish to repeat myself but I will summarize once again the principle applicable. The Court is entitled to investigate the action of the local authority with a view to seeing whether they have taken into account matters which they ought not to take into account, or, conversely, have refused to take into account or neglected to take into account matters which they ought to take into account. Once that question is answered in favour of the local authority, it may be still possible to say that, although the local authority have kept within the four corners of the matters which they ought to consider, they have nevertheless come to a conclusion so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it. In such a case, again, I think the Court can interfere. The power of the Court to interfere in each case is not as an appellate authority to override a decision of the local authority, but as a judicial authority which is concerned, and concerned only, to see whether the local authority have contravened the law by acting in excess of the powers which Parliament has confided in them. The appeal must be dismissed with costs.β
43. The Wednesbury principle was first introduced to
Indian Jurisprudence in the case of Om Kumar & Ors. vs. Union of India.
Here, again, a similar question was posed before the Supreme Court, as to when
can the Court exercise its power of judicial review in cases of executive law
making. This Court, reiterated the same principles laid down in the Wednesbury
case.