K.S. Manjunath and Others vs. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa Batil, Since Deceased by his Lrs and Others [2025 INSC 1298] Plaintiff must both plead and prove readiness and willingness to perform to seek specific performance of an agreement RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 82. Section 16(c) of the Act of 1963 requires that a plaintiff must both plead […]
K.S. Manjunath and Others vs. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa Batil, Since Deceased by his Lrs and Others [2025 INSC 1298] Subsequent purchaser who acted merely on vendor’s claims without verification not protected from enforcement of prior agreement RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 68. In such circumstances referred to above, the subsequent purchasers are seeking to bring themselves within
Samiullah vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. [2025 INSC 1292] Blockchain can make land registration secure – SC RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 8.4 Reformation of Land Registration processes and to eschew “fraudulent/multiple registrations”. 35. Fortunately, due to technological advancement this process is duly and more accurately achievable. We have incorporated emerging technologies as instruments of institutional
Blockchain can make land registration secure – SC Read More »
Samiullah vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. [2025 INSC 1292] Registration Act mandates registration of documents and not the title RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 8.2 The problems relating to the legal structure. Rather strangely these legislations have long sustained dichotomy between ownership and registration. While Transfer of Property Act provides substantive legal framework for purchase and
Registration Act mandates registration of documents and not the title Read More »
MMTC Limited vs. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited [2025 INSC 1279] Scope of scrutiny under section 47 of the CPC while executing an arbitral award as a decree RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 97. We are dealing with an objection filed under Section 47 claiming that the award as upheld by this Court is inexecutable. As held
EPC Constructions India Limited Through Its Liquidator – Abhijit Guhathakurta vs. M/s Matix Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited [2025 INSC 1259] Amount paid up on preference shares not being loans do not qualify as a debt RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 20. It is well settled in Company Law that preference shares are part of the company’s share capital
Amount paid up on preference shares not being loans do not qualify as a debt Read More »
IN RE: Summoning Advocates who give legal opinion or represent parties during investigation of cases and related issues [2025 INSC 1275] Broad conspectus of the Client-Advocate privilege as codified in Section 132 to 134 of the BSA RELEVANT PARAGRAPH The Way Forward 67. On a broad conspectus of the Client-Advocate privilege as codified in Section
M/s. Lancor Holdings Limited vs. Prem Kumar Menon and others [2025 INSC 1277] Whether unworkable arbitral award passed with undue and unexplained delay liable to be set aside? RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 63. To conclude, the questions framed for consideration in these appeals are answered as under: (i) What is the effect of undue and unexplained delay
Denash vs. The State of Tamil Nadu [2025 INSC 1258] Special court has jurisdiction to order interim custody of the vehicle to the owner when he is unconnected with the transaction RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 21. Thus, a conjoint and holistic reading of Sections 60(3) and 63, makes it abundantly clear that the power to determine whether
Novenco Building and Industry A/S vs. Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Private Ltd. & Anr. [2025 INSC 1256] Criteria to determine whether a suit contemplates any urgent interim relief RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 20. The legal test distilled from the aforesaid decisions for the purposes of rejection of the plaint and for adjudication of interim relief can be
Criteria to determine whether a suit contemplates any urgent interim relief Read More »
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Litigating Hand website (our website), the user acknowledges that:
