Kalyani Transco vs. M/S Bhushan Power and Steel Limited and Others [2025 INSC 1165] International arbitral awards would be treated as contingent debts under the IBC RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 175. Before we examine whether the international arbitral awards would be treated as contingent or crystallized debts, we must first examine the status of foreign awards in […]
International arbitral awards would be treated as contingent debts under the IBC Read More Ā»
Executive Trading Company Private Limited vs. Grow Well Mercantile Private Limited [2025 INSC 1157] Sequence of steps of a summary suitĀ RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 7. To appreciate the procedural objection pointed out by the Plaintiff, the sequence of steps under Order XXXVII Rule 3 sub-Rules (1) to (7) of the CPC is set out as follows:
Sequence of steps of a summary suit Read More Ā»
Claim for additional post-award interest is barred when award fixes rate until payment as per the party agreement
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. M/s G&T Beckfield Drilling Services Pvt. Ltd [2025 INSC 1066] A clause merely barring award of interest on delayed payment by itself will not be readily inferred as a bar to award pendente-lite interest by the arbitral tribunal RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 18. In Union of India v. Ambica Construction
M/s. Motilal Agarwala vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. [2025 INSC 1062] Delivery of award to authorised representative not connected with arbitration does not amount to valid service RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 12. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, the only question that falls for
M/s Activitas Management Advisor Private Limited vs. Mind Plus Healthcare Private Limited [SLP (C) No. 27714 of 2024] Designation of exclusive court deemed as āseatā of arbitration in absence of seat/venue/place of arbitration RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 7. In Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. v. Kamachi Industries Ltd., this Court observed that: ā18. Where the contract specifies the
Glencore International AG vs. M/s. Shree Ganesh Metals and another [2025 INSC 1036] Mere non-signing wonāt invalidate arbitration agreement if parties otherwise consented to the arbitration RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 27. More relevant is the decision of this Court in Govind Rubber Limited vs. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Private Limited, wherein this Court observed that a commercial
Godrej Projects Development Limited vs. Anil Karlekar & Ors [2025 INSC 143] Unfair contract and Unfair trade practice in consumer disputes RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 30. ā¦.Relying on the provisions of Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which defines the term āunfair trade practiceā, this Court held that the contractual terms which are ex facie
Unfair contract and Unfair trade practice in consumer disputes Read More Ā»
Himanshu Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [2024 INSC 139] Grounds for cancellation of bail RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 12. Law is well settled by a catena of judgments rendered by this Court that the considerations for grant of bail and cancellation thereof are entirely different.Ā Ā Bail granted to an accused can only be cancelled if the
Grounds for cancellation of bail Read More Ā»
Ravindra Kumar vs. State of U.P. & Ors. [2024 INSC 131] Non-disclosure of a criminal case in which the candidate is acquitted in the verification form is not fatal for the candidateās employment RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 1. The vexed question is back again. Is it a hard and fast and a cut and dried rule that,
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Litigating Hand website (our website), the user acknowledges that:
