News of the Day - Page 5 of 22

When can court appreciate evidence at the stage of quashing of an FIR – Supreme Court of India [24.09.2025]

When can court appreciate evidence at the stage of quashing of an FIR Read More »

Complaint under the NI Act is maintainable against trustees without trust being made as an accused – Supreme Court [09.10.2025]

Complaint under the NI Act is maintainable against trustees without trust being made as an accused Read More »

A challenge cannot be raised against the decision making of the CoC unless the grounds for challenge as given in IBC are satisfied

Challenge cannot be raised against the decision making of the CoC unless the grounds for challenge given in IBC are satisfied Read More »

Kalyani Transco vs. M/S Bhushan Power and Steel Limited and Others [2025 INSC 1165] International arbitral awards would be treated as contingent debts under the IBC RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 175. Before we examine whether the international arbitral awards would be treated as contingent or crystallized debts, we must first examine the status of foreign awards in

International arbitral awards would be treated as contingent debts under the IBC Read More »

Executive Trading Company Private Limited vs. Grow Well Mercantile Private Limited [2025 INSC 1157] Sequence of steps of a summary suit RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 7. To appreciate the procedural objection pointed out by the Plaintiff, the sequence of steps under Order XXXVII Rule 3 sub-Rules (1) to (7) of the CPC is set out as follows:

Sequence of steps of a summary suit Read More »

Claim for additional post-award interest is barred when award fixes rate until payment as per the party agreement

Claim for additional post-award interest is barred when award fixes rate until payment as per the party agreement Read More »

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. M/s G&T Beckfield Drilling Services Pvt. Ltd [2025 INSC 1066] A clause merely barring award of interest on delayed payment by itself will not be readily inferred as a bar to award pendente-lite interest by the arbitral tribunal RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 18. In Union of India v. Ambica Construction

Bar on power of Arbitral Tribunal to award pendente-lite interest not to be readily inferred Read More »

M/s. Motilal Agarwala vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. [2025 INSC 1062] Delivery of award to authorised representative not connected with arbitration does not amount to valid service RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 12. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, the only question that falls for

Delivery of award to authorised representative not connected with arbitration does not amount to valid service Read More »

M/s Activitas Management Advisor Private Limited vs. Mind Plus Healthcare Private Limited [SLP (C) No. 27714 of 2024] Designation of exclusive court deemed as ‘seat’ of arbitration in absence of seat/venue/place of arbitration RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 7. In Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. v. Kamachi Industries Ltd., this Court observed that: “18. Where the contract specifies the

Designation of exclusive court deemed as ‘seat’ of arbitration in absence of seat/venue/place of arbitration Read More »

Glencore International AG vs. M/s. Shree Ganesh Metals and another [2025 INSC 1036] Mere non-signing won’t invalidate arbitration agreement if parties otherwise consented to the arbitration RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 27. More relevant is the decision of this Court in Govind Rubber Limited vs. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Private Limited, wherein this Court observed that a commercial

Mere non-signing won’t invalidate arbitration agreement if parties otherwise consented to the arbitration Read More »